CLO Debt Investing: AAA to BBB Tranches
CLO debt tranches—from AAA to BBB and below—offer institutional investors floating-rate credit exposure with structural protections unavailable in traditional corporate bonds. With yields ranging from SOFR + 120 bps (AAA) to SOFR + 600+ bps (BB), CLO debt serves diverse investment mandates across the risk spectrum.
This guide covers the strategies, risks, and best practices for investing in CLO debt tranches, from ultra-conservative AAA allocations to yield-focused mezzanine positions.
Overview: CLO Debt Tranche Profiles
| Tranche | Rating | Typical Spread (SOFR+) | % of Structure | Subordination | Primary Investors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class A | AAA | 120-150 bps | 60-65% | 35-40% | Insurance companies, pension funds, banks |
| Class B | AA | 165-200 bps | 7-9% | 25-32% | Insurance companies, asset managers |
| Class C | A | 200-240 bps | 5-7% | 18-25% | Asset managers, insurers, funds |
| Class D | BBB | 285-350 bps | 5-7% | 11-18% | Credit-focused funds, crossover buyers |
| Class E | BB | 500-600 bps | 4-6% | 6-12% | High-yield funds, hedge funds |
Note: Spreads as of Q4 2024. Actual spreads vary by manager tier, market conditions, and deal structure.
AAA Tranches: The Conservative Core
Investment Profile
- Rating: AAA by Moody's, S&P, and/or Fitch
- Yield: SOFR + 120-150 bps (absolute: 6.2-6.5% when SOFR = 5.0%)
- Default history: Zero AAA CLO defaults since 1994
- Subordination: 35-40% of capital structure absorbs losses before AAA is impaired
- Typical minimum: $250K-$1M per tranche
Why Institutions Buy AAA CLOs
1. Yield Premium Over AAA Corporates
- AAA CLO tranches yield 40-80 bps more than AAA-rated corporate bonds of similar duration
- Example (Q4 2024): AAA CLO at 6.3% vs. AAA corporate bond at 5.7% = 60 bps pickup
2. Floating-Rate Exposure
- CLO coupons reset quarterly based on SOFR
- Natural hedge against inflation and rising rates
- Low duration risk (typically 0.25-0.5 years modified duration)
3. Structural Protection
- 35-40% subordination cushion
- Coverage tests divert cash flows to AAA if portfolio deteriorates
- Diversification across 150-300 loans in underlying portfolio
4. Regulatory Treatment
- AAA CLOs qualify as High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) for banks (Level 2B)
- Favorable capital treatment for insurance companies under RBC/Solvency II
AAA Risk Considerations
While AAA CLOs have never defaulted, investors face:
- Mark-to-market volatility: Secondary market prices can decline 5-15% during stress (March 2020: AAA CLOs fell to 85-92 before recovering)
- Spread widening risk: AAA spreads can widen 50-150 bps during dislocations
- Refinancing risk: Equity may refinance AAA at lower spreads, forcing reinvestment at worse terms
- Extension risk: If portfolio deteriorates, early amortization may be delayed
AAA Strategy: Tier 1 Managers vs. Tier 2/3
| Factor | Tier 1 Managers | Tier 2/3 Managers |
|---|---|---|
| AAA Spread | SOFR + 120-135 bps | SOFR + 140-160 bps |
| Liquidity | Highly liquid; tight bid-ask (10-20 bps) | Less liquid; wider bid-ask (30-50 bps) |
| Risk | Marginally lower (better underwriting) | Marginally higher (less track record) |
| Strategy | Accept lower yield for liquidity/brand | Capture 15-25 bps premium; hold to maturity |
Investor choice: Conservative buyers prefer Tier 1 managers (Ares, Blackstone, Oak Hill) for liquidity and reputation. Yield-focused buyers may target Tier 2/3 for spread pickup, accepting lower liquidity.
AA and A Tranches: The Mezzanine Sweet Spot
AA Tranches
- Yield: SOFR + 165-200 bps
- Subordination: 25-32% (slightly less cushion than AAA)
- Default history: Near-zero defaults; extremely rare downgrades
- Investor appeal: Higher yield than AAA with minimal additional risk
A Tranches
- Yield: SOFR + 200-240 bps
- Subordination: 18-25%
- Historical performance: Very low default rates; occasional downgrades during severe stress
- Investor appeal: Investment-grade rating with high-yield-like returns
Why AA/A Tranches Are Popular
Risk-Adjusted Returns: AA/A tranches historically offer the best risk-adjusted returns in the CLO capital structure:
- Yields 40-100 bps higher than AAA
- Still maintain substantial subordination (20-30%)
- Investment-grade ratings (satisfy regulatory requirements)
- Very low default risk (coverage tests protect these tranches almost as well as AAA)
Institutional Fit:
- Insurance companies seeking yield without exiting investment-grade mandates
- Pension funds targeting 6-7% returns with moderate risk
- Asset managers building diversified credit portfolios
BBB Tranches: The Crossover Zone
Investment Profile
- Yield: SOFR + 285-350 bps (absolute: 7.9-8.5% when SOFR = 5.0%)
- Subordination: 11-18%
- Rating: BBB (lowest investment-grade tier)
- Risk: Moderate; payment deferrals possible during severe stress
BBB Investor Considerations
Advantages:
- Still investment-grade rated (satisfies many mandates)
- Yields approach high-yield bond territory (7-9%)
- 11-18% subordination provides meaningful cushion
- Floating-rate exposure (hedges inflation/rate risk)
Risks:
- Coverage test sensitivity: BBB tranches are often the first to experience interest payment deferrals if OC/IC tests fail
- 2008-2009 precedent: Some BBB tranches had interest payments diverted to senior tranches for 12-24 months
- Refinancing risk: Equity may call deal early, forcing reinvestment at lower yields
- Downgrade risk: BBB tranches are more likely to be downgraded to BB during stress (losing investment-grade status)
BBB Strategy: New Issue vs. Secondary
| Approach | Pricing | Advantage | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary (New Issue) | Par (100) | Select Tier 1 managers; structural protections | Must commit before final portfolio assembled |
| Secondary (Seasoned) | 85-105 | Buy at discount if stressed; see actual performance | May inherit poor portfolio or weak manager |
BB and B Tranches: High-Yield Territory
Investment Profile
- Yield: SOFR + 500-700+ bps
- Rating: BB / B (non-investment grade)
- Subordination: 6-12% (only equity below)
- Risk: High; vulnerable to coverage test failures and payment deferrals
Who Buys BB/B CLO Debt?
- High-yield bond funds (treating CLO BB/B as HY bond alternatives)
- Hedge funds seeking leveraged credit exposure
- Credit opportunity funds buying distressed tranches at discounts
Why BB/B Over Equity?
BB/B tranches offer a middle ground between equity and investment-grade debt:
- Fixed coupon: Unlike equity (residual), BB/B have contractual coupons (though deferrable if tests fail)
- Priority over equity: BB/B are paid before equity in the waterfall
- Lower risk than equity: 6-12% subordination cushion protects against some losses
- Yield approaching equity: 9-12% all-in yields approach equity returns with less volatility
BB/B Risk: Payment Deferrals
Scenario: Portfolio deteriorates → OC/IC tests fail → Cash diverted from BB/B to AAA/AA.
- 2008-2009 experience: Many BB tranches had interest payments deferred for 12-36 months
- Eventual recovery: Most BB tranches that deferred payments eventually paid accrued interest once tests cured
- Principal risk: If losses exceed subordination, BB/B can experience principal impairment
Primary Market vs. Secondary Market Strategies
Primary Market (New Issue) Strategy
Process:
- Participate in roadshow; review preliminary portfolio
- Submit orders during book-building (indicate tranche and size)
- Receive allocation based on demand and investor relationships
- Fund at closing (typically 100 cents on the dollar)
Advantages:
- Access to Tier 1 managers before paper trades in secondary
- Full due diligence access (manager meetings, detailed portfolio review)
- Structural protections negotiated upfront
- No liquidity discount
Disadvantages:
- Must commit before portfolio is finalized (warehouse risk)
- New issue spreads may tighten in secondary if market improves
- Competing with other institutional investors for allocations
Secondary Market Strategy
Opportunities:
- Distressed buying: Purchase BBB/BB tranches at 70-85 cents when coverage tests fail but recovery is expected
- Upgrade plays: Buy A-rated tranches at 98-99 if manager is likely to cure tests and refi
- Yield maximization: Buy Tier 2/3 manager AAA at wider spreads than Tier 1
Risks:
- Information asymmetry: Seller may know something you don't
- Liquidity: Hard to exit if wrong—secondary market can freeze during stress
- Structural traps: May inherit deals with poor covenants or weak managers
Portfolio Construction: Diversification Strategies
Strategy 1: All-AAA Core
- Allocation: 100% AAA tranches
- Diversification: 15-30 different CLOs
- Manager mix: 70% Tier 1, 30% Tier 2 (for yield pickup)
- Expected return: SOFR + 125-140 bps
- Use case: Conservative institutions; pension funds; insurance general accounts
Strategy 2: Mezzanine Ladder
- Allocation: 50% AAA, 30% AA, 20% A
- Expected return: SOFR + 150-170 bps
- Use case: Moderate risk-takers seeking yield without exiting investment grade
Strategy 3: Crossover Portfolio
- Allocation: 40% A, 40% BBB, 20% BB
- Expected return: SOFR + 280-350 bps
- Use case: Credit-focused funds; high-yield allocators seeking structural protections
Due Diligence Checklist for CLO Debt Investors
Manager Evaluation
- Historical default rates vs. market (lower = better)
- Coverage test failure frequency (fewer failures = stronger manager)
- Tier classification (Tier 1 preferred for liquidity)
- AUM and vintage diversity (larger, more experienced = better)
Portfolio Quality Metrics
- Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): Lower = higher quality. Target: 2700-3000.
- CCC exposure: Should be < 7.5%. Lower = safer.
- Weighted Average Spread (WAS): Higher spread portfolios generate more cushion. Target: 425-475 bps.
- Diversity Score: Higher = more diversification. Target: 70+.
Structural Protections
- OC/IC cushions: How far above trigger levels? More cushion = safer.
- CCC haircuts: How are CCC loans valued in tests? Conservative = 70-85 cents.
- Call protection: Non-call period (typically 2 years) protects against early refinancing.
- Reinvestment period: Longer = more manager trading flexibility.
Tax Considerations
- Interest income: CLO debt payments are ordinary income (not qualified dividends)
- Tax-deferred accounts: Best held in IRAs, 401(k)s, or pension accounts to avoid annual income tax
- UBTI: Generally not an issue for debt (unlike equity)
- Non-U.S. investors: May face withholding taxes unless treaty provisions apply
Key Takeaways by Tranche
AAA: Core Holding
- Zero default history
- Yield premium over corporates
- Floating-rate exposure
- Best for: Conservative institutions
AA/A: Best Risk-Adjusted
- 40-100 bps more than AAA
- Still IG-rated
- Strong structural protections
- Best for: Yield-focused IG buyers
BBB: Crossover Play
- HY-like yields, IG rating
- Moderate subordination (11-18%)
- Deferral risk in severe stress
- Best for: HY/credit opportunity funds
BB/B: Equity Alternative
- 9-12% yields
- Priority over equity
- High deferral risk
- Best for: HY allocators, hedge funds
Further Reading
- CLO Structure – Understand tranching and subordination
- Coverage Tests – How OC/IC tests protect debt investors
- Manager Rankings – Evaluating manager quality
- Historical Returns – Performance by tranche and vintage
- CLO ETFs – Retail access alternative
Disclaimer
Educational content only. CLO debt investing involves risks including potential loss of principal, payment deferrals, and illiquidity. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consult qualified advisors before investing.